Some of the Latter Day Saints have claimed that as the Book of
Mormon is an abridgement of the Nephite records, it does not contain
all the doctrine of Christ, hence the need of the revelations of
Joseph Smith. All who make this claim are in error, as Christ himself
says, (Nephi ix:11), that his doctrine is contained in the Book
of Mormon. In speaking of the Book of Mormon he says, that when
these things shall be made known unto the Gentiles, that they might
know of the true points of my doctrine. We have also see in the
previous chapter, that the words and doctrine of Christ are to be
made known in the Bible and in the Nephite records. Now brethren,
these scriptures are as plain as can be; they need no comments of
mine to make them any more plain. The Doctrine and Covenants do
not claim to have been translated from the records of Nephi 's seed
-- the sealed records. This plain scripture should and will be sufficient
to convince any person without prejudice, that the Doctrine and
Covenants should be discarded as a law of God to the church. The
doctrine of Christ always was and will be the same. The Book of
Mormon tells us that the sealed records yet to come forth will contain
great mysteries of things that are to transpire before the end of
the world; but this is another thing outside of the gospel or doctrine
of Christ. Paul says that if an angel from heaven preach any other
gospel unto you, let him be accursed. The teachings or doctrine
of Christ as set forth in the Book of Mormon are full and plain.
Mormon says, "and now there cannot be written in this book even
the hundredth part of the things which Jesus did truly teach the
people." Of course this means all the words that Jesus taught or
spoke to them, including the great mysteries of things to take place
in the future, which mysteries the Lord forbade them to write. John
also says of the things which Jesus truly did and taught, the which,
if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world
itself could not contain the books that should be written." (John
xxi:25). But is any one so blind as to understand from this language
that the doctrine of Christ, or as we use the expression, the teachings
of Christ, are not contained in full in the Bible and in Book of
Mormon? No spiritual man would so interpret this scripture. In June,
1829, Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and myself, received this commandment
through the stone, "Behold, I give unto you a commandment, that
you rely upon the things which are written (then, at that time,
June, 1829), for in them are all things written concerning my church,
my gospel, and my rock." This revelation reads this way today in
the old Book of Commandments. But the Latter Day saints changed
it in 1834 to read different in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants.
The revelations received through the stone in 1829, agree with the
teachings of Christ in the Bible and Book of Mormon; but in order
to support the errors which were afterwards introduced by men, some
of the early revelations have been changed and added to, as I will
show you in another chapter. In order to uphold these errors, your
leaders claim that as the Book of Mormon is an abridgement of the
Nephite records, containing only a small part of the things which
Christ said and did, that it does not contain all the doctrines,
laws, ordinances and offices which Christ meant to be in the church;
therefore Brother Joseph's revelations are needed to establish other
doctrines, laws, ordinances and offices that Christ left out of
the Book of Mormon and the Bible, and out of the revelations when
God first gave them in 1829. Oh the weakness and folly of man! How
any person can be so blind in the face of all this evidence, as
to still uphold the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, is more than
I can understand. But there are none so blind as those who will
not see. You have changed the revelations from the way they were
first given and as they are today in the Book of Commandments, to
support the error of Brother Joseph in taking upon himself the office
of Seer to the church. You have changed the revelations to support
the error of high priests. You have changed the revelations to support
the error of a President of the high priesthood, high counselors,
etc. You have altered the revelations to support you in going beyond
the plain teachings of Christ in the new covenant part of the Book
of Mormon. You have changed and altered the revelations to support
the error of publishing those revelations in a book: the errors
you are in, revelations have been changed to support and uphold
them. You who are now living did not change them, but you who strive
to defend these things, are as guilty in the sight of God as those
who did change them. As I have stated, I am called to bear testimony
that the Bible, as well as the Book of Mormon, is true: and no one
should place the one book ahead of the other; they are one! The
Book of Mormon tells us that many plain things have been taken from
the Bible, so that the Gentiles stumble and contend about the true
points of Christ's doctrine. It says that the Book of Mormon has
been kept pure, and come forth pure so as to make plain the doctrine
of Christ; that we might know of the true points of his doctrine.
Is it not plain that we should rely upon it on all doctrinal points,
and the order of offices in the church? It certainly is, and this
is not placing it ahead of the Bible. The Book of Mormon is full
and plain on the doctrine of Christ. Christ chose "twelve" and called
them disciples, or elders (not apostles); and the "twelve" ordained
elders, priests, and teachers. These are all the spiritual offices
in the church: that is, the officers who are ordained to officiate
in spiritual ordinances; as baptism, laying on of hands for the
gift of the Holy Ghost; ordaining other officers, administering
the Lord s supper, etc. The office of a Bishop is to administer
in temporal things. He is the business man of the church. The church
has a right to appoint officers who act in a temporal capacity;
this is outside of the spiritual offices. We see that the disciples
at Jerusalem appointed temporal officers. Acts vi:2-3: Then the
twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said:
It is notreason that we should leave the word of God and serve tables.
Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report,
full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this
business." So they appointed the seven deacons. "And God hath set
some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly
teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments,
diversities of tongues." (1 Cor. xii:28). The Latter Day Saints
stumble over this passage, and it is strange that they do. Paul
is not referring here to all the officers in the church. The office
of an Elder is not named. He refers to miracles, gifts of healing,
diversities of tongues, and these are not offices in the Church.
He is referring here to the gifts, as you can see plainly by reading
the chapter. He says at the conclusion of this, in the thirtyfirst
verse, "But covet earnestly the best gifts." In the New Testament
it speaks of evangelists, pastors, teachers, helps, governments,
etc. Are we to suppose from this, that we are now to establish offices
in the Church under those respective names of helps, pastors, governments,
etc.? Not at all. These names come to us thus translated. Concerning
the spiritual offices in the church, Elders, Priests and Teachers,
with their duties as given in the Book of Mormon, they comprise
the officers who are qualified to act in all spiritual matters,
and there is no need of any more spiritual offices than these in
the church, as we can plainly see from the scriptures. The Book
of Mormon is full concerning all spiritual matters pertaining to
the Church of Christ. Instructions are given as to the manner of
baptism, laying on of hands, the manner of administering the flesh
and blood of Christ; that the church must meet together oft to fast
and to pray and to speak concerning the welfare of of their souls;
how the meeting should be conducted; how a backsliding member is
to be tried, before the Elders by the testimony of three witnesses,
and if they repented not, they were to be cut off, etc., etc. It
is all set forth therein in plainness, and we have no need of the
Doctrine and Covenants or any other creed. The twelve at Jerusalem
are called in the written word "Apostles." They are apostles because
they were special witnesses to the sufferings of Christ, his death,
burial and resurrection: but the twelve which Christ chose on this
land are called disciples or elders, and are not once called apostles
in the Book of Mormon. In the revelation which came through the
stone in June, 1829, to Oliver Cowdery and myself to search out
the twelve, they are also called disciples, and not apostles; and
the revelation says "disciples" in the Book of Commandments today.
But it has been changed in the Doctrine and Covenants to read "apostles."
The heading to this revelation in the Book of Commandments says:
Making known the calling of twelve 'Disciples' in these last days.
"In the Doctrines and Covenants to reads: "Making known the calling
of twelve 'Apostles' in these last days." In 1 Nephi iii:26, where
reference is made to the twelve at Jerusalem and the twelve upon
this land, each twelve are called by their respective names: "Behold
the twelve 'Disciples' of the Lamb, who are chosen to minister unto
thy seed. And he (the angel) said unto me, thou remembereth the
twelve 'Apostles' of the Lamb? Behold they are they who shall judge
the twelve tribes of Israel: wherefore, the twelve ministers of
thy seed shall be judged of them. The twelve on this land are called
disciples, and not in any place are they called apostles. When Christ
was teaching the twelve on this land, in giving them instructions
He refers to the way His twelve apostles did at Jerusalem in the
laying on of hands, saying to them: For thus do mine apostles."
In 1 Cor. xii:28, it says: "And God hath set some in the church,
first apostles, secondarily prophets," etc. He did so, placing the
twelve apostles first, which he chose at Jerusalem: they are to
judge the twelve tribes of Israel, and they are to judge the twelve
disciples whom Christ chose on this land among the Nephites. Therefore,
we see from the written word that there is only one twelve who are
called apostles, and that they are placed first. When it is God's
own due time to gather up the scattered fragments of his kingdom
which has been laid waste by men, then we suppose that God will
place at the head of his church twelve disciples; but we of the
Church of Christ will not place them there, unless God so commands
us. This is Gods' work and not man's work. We do not believe in
twelve manmade disciples. I consider the Book of Doctrine and Covenants
a creed of religious faith. You can see from the first edition (Kirtland,
1835) that men, on the authority of other men, and no authority
from God, arranged the items of the doctrine of Jesus Christ in
that book, and in August, 1835, adopted it as the doctrine and covenants
of their faith by a unanimous vote of the high council, thus making
it a law to the church for the first time. To these proceedings
I objected from the first, as I also did to changing the name of
the church. Why should they not have been satisfied with the way
that God has arranged the items of his doctrine in his Holy Word?
What authority had they for making a creed? I will quote from the
Kirtland edition of the Book of Doctrine and Covenants of 1835,
and you can see for yourselves that what I say is correct. Quotation
from the preface: "We deem it to be unnecessary to entertain you
with a lengthy preface to the following volume, but merely to say
that it contains in short the leading items of the religion which
we have professed to believe. The first part of the book will be
found to contain a series of lectures as delivered before a theological
class in this place, and, in consequence of their embracing the
important doctrine of salvation, we have arranged them into the
following work. * * * There may be an aversion in the minds of some
against receiving anything purporting to be articles of religious
faith, in consequence of there being so many CREEDS now extant;
but if men believe a system and profess that it was given by inspiration,
certainly the more intelligibly they can present it the better.
* * * We have, therefore, endeavored to present, though in few words,
OUR belief, and, when we say this, humbly trust the faith and principles
of this society as a body." Where is their authority from God for
making this creed, and making it a law to the church? I will now
quote from pages 255 and 256 of the same book: The assembly being
duly organized, and, after transacting certain business of the church,
proceeded to appoint a committee to ARRANGE THE ITEMS OF DOCTRINE
OF JESUS CHRIST. * * * These items are to be taken from the Bible,
Book of Mormon, and the revelations which have been given to said
church up to its date, or shall be until such arrangement is made.
* * * Whereupon the High Council of Kirtland accepted and acknowledged
them as the doctrine and covenants of their faith by a unanimous
vote." It was here made a law to the church for the first time.
So we see that their whole proceedings were upon their own authority
-- upon the authority of men and not God. Also, that the Doctrine
and Covenants is a creed, as much so as any sectarian creed. Some
of the Latter Day Saints claim that the Doctrine and Covenants is
one of the Books spoken of in Nephi's vision, which he saw taken
to the Lamanites from the Gentiles. (1 Nephi iii:42.) How anyone
can so interpret that scripture is more than I can understand; because
it says on the same page, that those "Books" (records) contained
the words that Christ spake unto the Nephites, which words should
be hid up, to come forth to the Gentiles, after the Nephites had
dwindled in unbelief. Nephi saw "other Books" taken to the Lamanites,
after the Bible was taken to them. The Book of Mormon is one of
those books, but the other is yet to come forth from the Nephite
records, which are yet hid up and sealed. It is to come to the Gentiles,
and they will carry it and the Book of Mormon to the Lamanites,
to the convincing of the Gentiles, the Lamanites and the Jews. Now,
how is it that anyone can claim the Doctrine and Covenants as being
one of those "Books ?" The Book of Doctrine and Covenants itself
does not claim to be the words of the Nephite record which are hid
up. The Book of Mormon was translated from those records, and more
is yet to be translated from them, but it will not come forth in
the days of wickedness (2 Nephi xi:17. Ether i:11). I will quote
the scripture relating to the "other Books" which Nephi saw in his
vision. It is very plain. (1 Nephi iii:41-42). The angel, talking
to Nephi, says: "Behold, saith the Lamb, I will manifest myself
unto thy seed (the Nephites), that they shall write many things
which I shall minister unto them, which shall be plain and precious;
and after thy seed shall be destroyed and dwindle in unbelief, and
also the see of thy brethren; behold, these things shall be hid
up, to come forth unto the Gentiles, by the gift and power of the
Lamb; and in them shall be written my gospel, saith the Lamb, and
my rock and my salvation; ... (same page) And it came to pass that
I beheld the remnant of the seed of my brethren (the Lamanites),
and also the Book of the Lamb of God, which had proceeded forth
from the mouth of the Jew (the Bible), that it came forth from the
Gentiles, unto the remnant of the seed of my brethren; and after
it had come forth unto them (the Lamanites), I beheld OTHER BOOKS,
which came forth by the power of the Lamb, from the Gentiles unto
them, unto the convincing of the Gentiles, and the remnant of the
seed of my brethren, and also the Jews, who were scattered upon
all the face of the earth," etc. Now brethren, words cannot be plainer
than this scripture, and it shows that the Book of Doctrine and
Covenants is not one of those books. It is strange to me, why the
heads of your church will attempt to prove that the Book of Doctrine
and Covenants is one of those books here spoken of, as they are
to come from sealed records which are yet hid up.
|